Philosophy and Science for the Third Millennium
I Am Canadian
An Essay by Christopher Bek
Summary—I Am Canadian argues that Canadians must find a new way to become leaders on the world stage.
Caption—Men have called me mad—but the question is not yet settled—whether madness is or is not the loftiest intelligence—whether much that is glorious—whether all that is profound—does not spring from disease of thought—from moods of minds exalted at the expense of general intellect.
—Edgar Allan Poe
A successful business executive is a forecaster first—purchasing, production, marketing, pricing and organizing all follow.
The original compact is not made with a sovereign power since the existence of such a power is the end result and not the foundation of the compact.
Natural rights are inalienable—ie. even if you seek to bargain them away you cannot since they are they are not the kind of thing that can be bargained.
are compelled by reason to acknowledge the existence of natural, inalienable
rights and duties independent of convention, agreement or contract.
The Bernoulli Form elucidates the notion of Platonic Forms in describing how a motley crew of Forms—including Delphi, forecasting, integration, utility, optimization, efficiency and complementary—come together to form The Bernoulli Model.
The Method of Moments elucidates the notion of Platonic Forms in describing how a motley crew of Forms—including Delphi, forecasting, integration, utility, optimization, efficiency and complementary—come together to form The Bernoulli Model.
The Efficient Frontier examines the notions of God, option theory, portfolio theory, faith, reason and Arab math—finally arriving at the inescapable conclusion that all roads of sound decisionmaking lead to the efficient frontier.
The Unpardonable Sin charges all honourables and doctors in Canada with heresy, child abuse and the unpardonable sin that Christ spoke of—which is the deliberate refusal to follow the light when seen.
The Uncertainty Principle contrasts Einstein with Heisenberg, relativity with quantum theory, behavioralism with existentialism, certainty with uncertainty and philosophy with science—finally arriving at the inescapable Platonic conclusion that the true philosopher is always striving after Being and will not rest with those multitudinous phenomena whose existence are appearance only.
A Formal Patient congratulates Alberta Health and Wellness for insisting on the accountability of due process in declaring individuals to be formal patients—and argues that I am being considered a formal patient as the result of an absence of due process elsewhere in Canada—and that I should not be considered a formal patient but that I should be declared disabled on account of being outside the cave of behaviorism.
Singularity identifies the trigger of the looming paradigm shift from the three-dimensionally conscioused Everyman to the four-dimensionally conscioused Superman as the 1935 Schrödinger's Cat though problem—which proves that consciousness is real.
The Great Cosmic Accounting Blunder compares the two physical fixedpoints in the universe—lightspeed and Planck’s constant—and argues that we have been guilty of double counting up until now and that in fact there is but one fixedpoint—which, as it turns out, is the boundary of the universe.
The Unified Field Theory counts down the Euclidean hits from five to one in categorically nailing the vast majority of this little thing I like to call cosmic pi. At this point in spacetime I would like to pay special tribute to my excellent wingman Albert Einstein (1879–1955).
Closing the Liars Loophole identifies the malignant cancer within the healthcare system and society as the outwardly focusing behavioral psychological model, which denies the existence of consciousness—while the inwardly focusing existential model makes consciousness and the soul primordially important.
I am a sick man. I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man. I think that
my liver hurts. But I don’t know a damn thing about my illness. I am not
even sure what it is that hurts. I am not in treatment and never have been,
although I respect both medicine and doctors. Besides, I am superstitious in
the extreme. I am sufficiently educated not to be superstitious, but I am.
No, sir, I refuse to see a doctor simply out of spite. Now, that is
something you will probably fail to understand. Naturally, I will not be
able to explain to you precisely whom I will injure in this instance by my
spite. I know perfectly well that I am certainly not giving the doctors a
dirty deal by not seeking treatment. I know better than anyone that I will
only harm myself by this, and no one else. My liver hurts. Good, let it hurt
I am a sick man. I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man. I think that my liver hurts. But I don’t know a damn thing about my illness. I am not even sure what it is that hurts. I am not in treatment and never have been, although I respect both medicine and doctors. Besides, I am superstitious in the extreme. I am sufficiently educated not to be superstitious, but I am. No, sir, I refuse to see a doctor simply out of spite. Now, that is something you will probably fail to understand. Naturally, I will not be able to explain to you precisely whom I will injure in this instance by my spite. I know perfectly well that I am certainly not giving the doctors a dirty deal by not seeking treatment. I know better than anyone that I will only harm myself by this, and no one else. My liver hurts. Good, let it hurt still more.
Existential Freedom. So begins the existential text entitled Notes from the Underground (1864) written by the Russian writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-80) defined existentialism as the philosophy for which existence precedes essence. For manmade things, the idea of the thing comes before the actual thing itself—that is, essence precedes existence. But for man, who arrives on the scene and then becomes what he is, existence precedes essence. The difference is that man continually creates his own essence in every moment through his decisions and actions. René Descartes (1596-1650) insisted on the primacy of the individual and the analysis of human consciousness. This starting point for existential philosophy is the Cartesian cogito—ie. cogito, ergo sum—ie. I think, therefore I exist. Awareness of consciousness or self-awareness is coincident with the act of soul-searching and is what separates man from animal. In addition to the Cartesian cogito, René Descartes also formulated the theory of systematic doubt whereby the doubter says no to arguments no matter how plausible so long as he saw the possibility of doubting the argument. Existential freedom is the ultimate freedom that cannot be taken from a man. In essence, it is the right to say no. Existential freedom refers to the fact that we can make any choice at any time through reflection on the cogito. Existential freedom is the theory which asserts that we are condemned to be free.
The Existential Cognitive Model. Consider that the Freudian cognitive model makes the reality-based ego the decisionmaker who must choose between the internal values of the id, self, soul, mathematics, the method of argument and God—and the external authority of the superego, behaviorism, scholasticism, church, government, medicine and education. Remember the Socratic belief that by knowing thyself is the same as knowing God. Also remember what Sir James Jeans said—God is a mathematician. The authoritian cognitive model stands in direct contrast with the existential cognitive model. Existentialism is the philosophy which asserts that morality must be determined inwardly rather than from external authority. In its simplest terms, it is the ego acting like a search light that chooses between the id and the superego. The malignant cancer within society is the outwardly focusing behavioral psychological model—which denies the existence of consciousness—while the inwardly focusing existential model makes consciousness and the soul primordially important. QED—ie. quod erat demonstrandum—ie. which was to be proved. I propose that in one years time student doctors are responsible for determining whether The Existential Cognitive Model is valid or not.
The Method of Argument. Based on the natural light of reason, Descartes formulated his famous Cartesian Model for constructing arguments which is—Order thoughts from simple to complex—Only accept clear and distinct ideas as true—Divide arguments into as many parts as necessary—Check thoroughly for oversights—And, using reversibility, rehearse, examine and test arguments over and over until they can be grasped with a single act of intuition or faith. Initially, one faithfully or intuitively senses truth, which is followed up by constructing rational arguments and then intuitively capturing completed arguments. In other words, faith leads us to reason and then reason leads us back to faith. Consider then making Philosophymagazine a standard model for constructing arguments—ie. sixteen hundred words that begins with a story. Essentially, the difference between an argument and an opinion is that an opinion does not have to be backed up. And we must remember what Socrates said—Follow the argument wherever it leads. QED. I propose that in one years time university seniors are responsible for determining whether The Method of Argument is valid or not.
The Theory of One. It is well established that the greatest scientific problem of all time is how to marry relativity with quantum theory. Relativity is the natural law of space and time and is based on lightspeed. It describes spacetime dilation in accordance with the Pythagorean Form. The quantum theory of the atom is the natural law of matter and is based on both Planck’s constant and a probabilistic wave equation. I have solved the problem of how to unite relativity and quantum theory with my theory of one by recognizing lightspeed and Planck’s constant as the very same boundary of the spacetime continuum. I further argue that even if my Theory of One is wrong, it is still effectively right because it sets forth the pathway to truth—which is the question of how to unite relativity with quantum theory. QED. I propose that in one years time grade 12 high school students are responsible for determining whether The Theory of One is valid or not.
Ten Minutes and Ninety Minutes. Each sixteen hundred word essay takes approximately ten minutes to read. The ten minutes per essay multiply by nine essays then becomes an in-ninety-minute pocketbook. Philosophymagazine uses the option based deployment strategy. John Gribbin and Paul Strathern have produced an excellent library of twenty-five or so in-ninety-minute pocketbooks. For example one could read Einstein in Ten Minutes before going on to read Einstein in Ninety Minutes. Niels Bohr, one of the founding fathers of quantum theory, defined the complementary principle as the coexistence of two necessary and seemingly incompatible descriptions of the same phenomenon. One of its first realizations dates back to 1637 when Descartes revealed that algebra and geometry are the same thing—ie. analytic geometry. The ten minutes per essay multiplying by ten essays produces a ten essay pocketbook. Looking at the in-ten-minute essay provides a comparison to the in-ninety-minute essay or collection of essays. I sent a copy of my The Theory of One essay collection to Peter Mansbridge of the CBC in 2001.
Am Canadian. Blaise Pascal
(1623-62) once wrote that man escapes freedom by means of the two sovereign
anodynes of habit and diversion—He chases a bouncing ball or rides to
hounds after a fleeing animal—or the ball and fleeing game are pursued
through the labyrinth of social intrigue and amusement—anything, so long
as he manages to escape from himself. As
far as Canadians are concerned—our habits and diversions are about chasing
pucks and managing pucks or writing about chasing and managing pucks. Firstly our Canadian society must graduate from the method of
authority to the method of argument—meaning that the government must now
either challenge or accept standardized arguments such as
Philosophymagazine—ie. sixteen hundred words.
Secondly the cognitive model identifies the malignant cancer within
the healthcare system and society as the outwardly focusing behavioral
psychological model, which denies the existence of consciousness—while the
inwardly focusing existential model makes consciousness and the soul
primordially important. Thirdly
I propose that we would deliver five-essay pocketbooks of The Theory of One
in Ninety Minutes to grade twelve students.
At the end of the year the students would write a
Philosophymagazine-style essay argument depicting whether the theory is
correct or not. The stylized
pocketbooks would have large writing and fit perfectly into an inside coat
pocket. Fourthly we would
deliver single-sheet essays to coffee shops, old-age homes, homeless
shelters and prisons across Canada. Philosophymagazine
has the potential to turn Canada into a society with a hundred percent
literacy. And we must never
forget that higher truth is the cornerstone of mental wellness.
Conclusion. Since the government has neither challenged nor accepted my arguments—I would argue that we must spend the next year working towards determining the validity of the three arguments (challenger)—ie. The Existential Cognitive Model (student doctors) and The Method of Argument (university seniors), The Theory of One (grade 12 students). Here the challenger must write a Philosophymagazine-style essay either confirming or rejecting the arguments set forth. Firstly by writing monthly essays and secondly by orchestrating the production and distribution of material and thirdly by making myself available to meet with government agents—We could well turn Canada into the philosophic and scientific center of the world. As Descartes would say—Better the ladies of the salon rather than the pedants of the university. Lastly any government agent—eg. doctor or educator—choosing not to take responsibility for the current state of affairs is acting in bad faith.