Right Honourable Mary
Right Honourable Justin Trudeau
Right Honourable Richard Wagner
Honourable Sonya Savage
Honourable Kent Hehr
Dr Roman Reznikov, HUM
Denis Villeneuve, Film Director
PhilosophyMagazine.com
Simon Mr Christopher Bek
602, 1133 Eighth Avenue SW
Calgary AB Canada T2P 1J7
Christopher.Bek@gmail.com
The Theory of One
Existentialism Now
The Bernoulli Model
RiskServices.com
28 August 2022
Dear Mary, Justin and Richard
Subject—Reading Material for The Right Honourables
From—Mr Christopher Bek
To—Governor General Mary Simon
Quotation—War is a moral contest that is won in the temples before it is ever fought. —Sun Tzu
Please find enclosed a copy of the excellent: Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction (2016) by Okasha from the brilliant series of Very Short Introduction books from Oxford University Press. I would advise you to take the red pill and read Chapter 5: Scientific Change and Scientific Revolutions, and then buckle your seat belt Dorothy, cause Kansas is going bye-bye. In 1962, Thomas Kuhn presented his idea of a paradigm shift with his important book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Localized, it is a fundamental change in basic concepts and experimental practices of a scientific discipline. Globalized, it is a fundamental change in basic precepts perspectives and religious practices. The root of the word “religion” being a reconnection with reality. Kuhn contrasts paradigm shifts with normal science, the scientific thinking within a prevailing paradigm. Paradigm shifts arise when the dominant paradigm is rendered incompatible with emerging phenomena, thus facilitating a shift to a new theory or paradigm.
Quotation—When it was first published in 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. Fifty years later it still has many lessons to teach. With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas S Kuhn challenges long-standing
linear notions of scientific process, arguing that transformative ideas do not arise from the day-today, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation, but that the revolution in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of “normal science,” as he called it. Though Kuhn was writing when physics ruled the sciences, his ideas on how scientific revolutions bring order to the anomalies that amass over time in research experiments are still instructive in our biotech age. —From the back cover of the 1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions republished in 2012 Please also find enclosed a copy of the excellent: The Universe and Dr Einstein (1948) by Lincoln Barnett. Einstein had this to say about it: “Lincoln Barnett’s book represents a valuable contribution to popular scientific writing. The main ideas of the theory of relativity are extremely well presented. Moreover, the present state of our knowledge in physics is aptly characterized. The author shows how the growth of our factual knowledge, together with the striving for a unified theoretical conception comprising all empirical data, has led to the present situation which is characterized—notwithstanding all successes—by an uncertainty concerning the choice of the basic theoretical concepts.”
Quotation—In the century since the publication of the special theory of relativity, there remains a tendency to venerate Einstein’s genius without actually understanding his achievements. This book offers the opportunity to comprehend the workings of one of humanity’s greatest minds. Acclaimed by Einstein himself, it is among the clearest, most readable expositions of relativity theory. It explains the problems Einstein faced, the experiments that lead to his theories, and what his findings reveal about the forces that govern the universe. The concepts of relativity and the fourth dimension unfold with all the vivid excitement of research into the unknown, in language anyone can readily understand. —From the back cover of The Universe and Dr Einstein (1948) by Lincoln Barnett
Quotation—How four of Europe’s most mysterious and fascinating writers shaped the modern mind. Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Kafka were all outsiders in their societies, unable to fit into the accepted nineteenth-century categories of theology, philosophy, or belles lettres. Instead, they saw themselves both as the end products of a dying civilization and as prophets of the coming chaos of the twentieth century. In this brilliant combination of biography and lucid exposition, their apocalyptic visions of the future are woven together into a provocative portrait of modernity. —From the back cover of Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche & Kafka (1952) by William Hubben
I previously sent you copies of the excellent book: Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche & Kafka (1952) from which I have paraphrased the following: “Modern man wants neither God nor Christ— for what he desires is simply the authority of the Church. He wants the physical security of bread, the spiritual security of dogma, and the so-called proof of the existence of miracles. To follow God irrespective of the consequences presents too great a risk. The Church offers up a lighter burden. It serves, selects and explains the truth, forgives sins and bestows upon man the happiness of children. Yet the price is high. Man must surrender his freedom of thought and, indeed, he willingly does so. He no longer serves God as God demands of him, but only as the Church tells him so. God’s mysteries and miracles are henceforth monopolized and administered by the Church.”
I can personally attest to the mathematical fact that modern man wants neither God nor Christ— for what he wants is to get paid and get laid, which is behaviourism, the overwhelming social burden that compels us to behave normally so as to get paid and get laid. Existentialism Now is a massive upgrade over Bad Behaviourism, in terms of cognitive models, that turns the Everyman into the Superman. Existentialism Now recognizes the supremacy of the decision maker by fortifying each with the Cartesian cogito—I think therefore I exist—and the Indian identity—Atman equals Brahman. By studying God, the Mathematician in forms like actuarial science, we will come to know the mind of God. According to Leaderchat.org, 95 percent of people believe they are selfaware, but the real number is 12 to 15 percent. That means, on a good day, four out of five Canadians are lying to themselves about themselves all day long. My models of The Theory of One, Existentialism Now, The Bernoulli Model, and The Divine Right of Kings will enable me to turn that statistics around so that only 12 to 15 percent of Canadians are not self-aware. But I need your help. It is necessary that I receive a government hearing, overseen by the three Right Honourables, to decide whether to make me the fourth Right Honourable in Canada.
As far as my suicide is concerned, I will write a letter when the time is right notifying the readers that I will starve myself to death. I hope you understand that I am a new life form like at the end of the 1968 movie 2001: A Space Odyssey—and I have the documentation to prove it. I am a god. Know God’s thoughts; follow the argument; be self-aware; take responsibility; and swing wild!
Sincerely,
The Right Honourable Christopher Bek, The Philosopher King Christ, Sovereign of Earth, Christ 2.